The LinkedIn Nudge

Abstract professional networking image with the title "Choosing Roots Over the Climb" layered over generic connection icons.
Spread the love

LinkedIn nudged me today. “Connect with an Executive Director.” It arrived the way these things often do, a small suggestion wrapped in polite certainty, as if it knew something true about my life that I had somehow forgotten.

What struck me was not the recommendation itself, but the confidence behind it. The platform assumed this is the direction I should be moving in. This is the kind of person who should matter to me. My career path is incomplete without one more important title orbiting my profile.

Advertisement

It felt familiar. I have heard this quiet push in classrooms, offices, airport lounges, and hotel corridors. The soft encouragement to climb rather than root. To collect impressive contacts rather than meaningful relationships. To treat ambition as only the need to dominate.

I could almost hear the old script humming underneath. Success is vertical. Competence equals prestige. Leadership sits on the highest floors. It is a worldview that never took root in me. What stayed was the habit of pushing back, the slow practice of choosing another direction every time it appeared.

Still, the nudge unsettled me. Not because I believed it, but because part of me paused. A small reflex trained to see value in proximity to power. As if being connected to high-profile executives somehow enriches my life, as if their prominence spills competence into my days through a digital connection.

The algorithm may not feel malice, but it follows a logic that treats my attention as something to be extracted. It reflects a worldview that has been normalized for so long that I occasionally get caught up in it. Like it is a commonsense approach. Upward is better. Bigger is wiser. Titles are proof.

Advertisement

My life has taught me something else. The people who shaped me rarely had impressive job titles. The moments that changed my thinking never came from prestige. The growth I value has less to do with climbing and everything to do with curiosity and caring.

So I ignored the suggestion. Not out of rebellion. Well, maybe a bit, but my ambitions cannot belong to platforms or hierarchies. They come from the places I have lived, the choices I have made, and the people who keep me grounded. None of that looks like a LinkedIn profile.

Maybe that is the real story behind my reaction to the nudge. Not the algorithm’s intention, but the reminder it accidentally gives. The recognition that what constitutes success for the algorithm does not fit my understanding of what success should be.

AI Transparency Statement for “The LinkedIn Nudge — Choosing Roots Over the Climb”: The author defined all core concepts, direction, and parameters for this work. In the writing of this article “The LinkedIn Nudge — Choosing Roots Over the Climb,” AI assisted in drafting text, and editing and refinement. The AI tools used include ChatGPT and Claude. All AI-generated content was thoroughly reviewed and verified for accuracy and appropriateness. The final work reflects primarily human judgment and expertise.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Latest from Bethics.com

  • A Strategy That Rewrites the Transatlantic Relationship

    The 2025 National Security Strategy marks a clear shift in how Washington talks about Europe. Instead of treating the EU as a democratic partner, it frames the continent as unstable, weakened, and drifting. The irony is that these warnings come from a government undermining rights and institutions at home. The…

  • The Password Problem

    Data breaches are now routine, yet the responsibility for digital security consistently falls on the end-user. This article argues that the message is wrong: corporate security failures are the root cause of most risk, not user negligence. We examine the true privacy trade-offs of new login systems like biometrics and…

  • Globalization’s Selective Freedom

    Globalization was meant to bind nations together through cooperation and trade. Instead, it produced a selective freedom where capital moves without limits while people face growing barriers. This essay explores how the promise of openness was captured by corporate and political elites, and why rebuilding from the local level may…

Read more at bethics.com

About this wepage

gaute.work is the official page of Gaute Gulliksen. It’s managed by Bethics, S.A. de C.V. and is mainly here to track my projects and, from time to time, share a few thoughts. Curious about how your data is handled? Check out the Privacy Policy.

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.